{"id":"W6904863327","doi":"10.14288/1.0398282","title":"The Insignificance of Thresholds in Environmental Impact Assessment : An illustrative case study in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Collections","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insignificance; Environmental impact assessment; Variety (cybernetics); Impact assessment; Scale (ratio); Economic impact analysis; Environmental policy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028505,0.0001357667,0.0001962929,0.00001465982,0.0009095239,0.0001872592,0.0002755178,0.00002985962,0.001529537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009677631,0.0001100486,0.00003106069,0.0006907094,0.0001223454,0.0003908399,0.000345421,0.0002143337,0.000002001555],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004112253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006570636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9841811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986618,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984711,0.0003378718,0.0003225194,0.000289813,0.0003146953,0.0002639303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994208,0.00009721715,0.00009247677,0.0002820106,0.000002670462,0.0001048789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000178604,0.00143586,0.9879008,6.078332e-7,0.00002706622,0.001014697,0.001673147,0.004704833,0.001024162,0.000001971641,0.00112969,0.001069282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007886002,0.0002635997,0.911592,0.00000450836,0.0000091148,0.0001024418,0.08617645,0.0004449199,0.0001846971,0.00009255207,0.0001975534,0.0001435453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742009,0.000008881995,0.000004118153,0.00005178896,0.00007500232,0.0008024285,0.00005820649,0.000001881164,0.02479677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954844,0.00002240581,0.00008618746,0.00003307566,0.000006226887,0.0001410378,0.000008020741,0.000009705895,0.004208946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0845033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02341335024576127,"score_gpt":0.3286202179143574,"score_spread":0.3052068676685962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}