{"id":"W6921007996","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3636053_d1.v1","title":"Additional file 1: of Rationale, design, and methods for Canadian alliance for healthy hearts and minds cohort study (CAHHM) â a Pan Canadian cohort study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort study; Alliance; Cohort; Epidemiology; Qualitative research; Retrospective cohort study","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01018834,0.001795935,0.002021753,0.003081869,0.003840741,0.002141479,0.002973111,0.001864317,0.690403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09526462,0.001608623,0.001625034,0.00475726,0.0009152034,0.001828256,0.001042017,0.001957785,0.07303986],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01061912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09375659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1449759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966431,0.001119917,0.000590218,0.0007367889,0.0005470773,0.0003628382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486251,0.03260636,0.002545983,0.00579524,0.008538598,0.001888591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001036476,0.0001769697,0.004445602,0.001943855,0.00011994,0.00005722513,0.0002134894,0.0002644991,0.0000560924,0.001452555,0.9817064,0.008526878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02646848,0.001089332,0.06022333,0.01273512,0.001428841,0.000744553,0.001642837,0.002753928,0.0008916573,0.02170762,0.8698555,0.0004587697],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007392535,0.00009157341,0.002180372,0.0004090309,0.0002181126,0.006231091,0.9869744,0.0001976871,0.002958515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03958721,0.000873623,0.03426296,0.005151673,0.0009812975,0.2429966,0.618458,0.001475401,0.05621321],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4416025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04935567164857913,"score_gpt":0.3183685301789621,"score_spread":0.2690128585303829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}