{"id":"W6921111787","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3625022_d1","title":"Additional file 1: of Cost-effectiveness analysis of anal cancer screening in women with cervical neoplasia in British Columbia, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Cervical Cancer and HPV Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anal cancer; Anal canal; Cervical cancer screening; Value (mathematics); Cervical screening; Univariate analysis; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002793654,0.001158441,0.002144772,0.002421699,0.0008364023,0.001238211,0.001854589,0.0007199932,0.4469047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03350696,0.0007820294,0.005458747,0.005316868,0.0002836948,0.0008949477,0.0007100178,0.001142818,0.009286969],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01488216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01574866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7910188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8203608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981064,0.0006009737,0.0002193574,0.0002237822,0.0004649815,0.0003844776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810069,0.01396418,0.0008268973,0.000466905,0.003363173,0.0003717909],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006318706,0.0003073449,0.04239952,0.01993993,0.004774381,0.0002573928,0.0001750348,0.01656716,0.0001545377,0.002466468,0.880831,0.02580859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06484972,0.001984988,0.4830252,0.03223824,0.02412245,0.001130337,0.00150883,0.04681597,0.001874785,0.007902468,0.3337183,0.0008287087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002520855,0.000225011,0.0001668161,0.000189437,0.00003920806,0.0005277093,0.9931487,0.0000557964,0.003126432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.312151,0.002471901,0.007470357,0.001741464,0.0002243119,0.0123138,0.6291767,0.0006117314,0.03383876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4469047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7889234,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02837266963947527,"score_gpt":0.2857897272950681,"score_spread":0.2574170576555929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}