{"id":"W6931812695","doi":"10.5284/1127550","title":"Archaeological desk-based assessment and rapid buildings appraisal of the former Stanley Tools, Rutland Road, ShefÏeld","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archaeology Data Service","topic":"Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extant taxon; Quarter (Canadian coin); Demolition; Documentary evidence; Historic site; Archaeological evidence; Urbanization","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001997343,0.0002151258,0.0003942627,0.0000642013,0.0009393951,0.000007756202,0.001526806,0.0002266944,0.0001750583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005279685,0.000135972,0.00006458687,0.0004943656,0.004416741,0.0002798189,0.00246727,0.0004290776,0.000006906954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006981223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001730435,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007288206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04568508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974458,0.0004215242,0.0004267877,0.0005613587,0.0004407399,0.0007038426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972754,0.001520236,0.0001990235,0.0006317316,0.0001882504,0.000185406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003756847,0.0002739127,0.7106383,0.0001299062,0.000232534,0.00003996576,0.05180362,0.00001059676,0.0005037796,0.1696757,0.001590748,0.06472515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008763263,0.0002419688,0.6090936,0.00003171742,0.00009451132,0.00001669245,0.005970189,0.0001403929,0.00009390876,0.006852064,0.3762585,0.0003301428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239252,0.001856816,0.003448201,0.06512915,0.0007545368,0.0005436399,0.0001629914,0.00009885841,0.00408062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987639,0.0002800082,0.008479137,0.003131289,0.0001763632,0.00001682778,0.0000927193,0.000009942314,0.0001747304],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3746677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07058610921792617,"score_gpt":0.3545321404709634,"score_spread":0.2839460312530372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}