{"id":"W6948543298","doi":"10.5167/uzh-94705","title":"'Doing good with a vengeance': a critical assessment of the practice, effects and implications of 'drug treatment courts' in North America","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Criminal justice; Punishment (psychology); Legitimacy; Recidivism; Government (linguistics); Popularity; Politics; Deviance (statistics)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02737772,0.0008738438,0.001138828,0.006413516,0.06897546,0.02138068,0.006700394,0.01021225,0.002794826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05432948,0.0007344997,0.0005372799,0.00718435,0.118684,0.009901602,0.01042083,0.0129382,0.0002417451],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1300119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1316895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7512651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8765271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9414302,0.04082454,0.0009674352,0.002717288,0.007134665,0.006926018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9270039,0.05182978,0.004222869,0.001691987,0.01276266,0.002488999],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001854067,0.00004964523,0.001069989,0.0003215044,0.00001257774,0.0004140679,0.796657,0.0001020212,0.0001067264,0.1682416,0.01147003,0.0215364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001463761,0.0000622902,0.006627423,0.001318711,0.00003990806,0.0001472246,0.8561663,0.0001918792,0.0002150975,0.01672951,0.1184307,0.0000563456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3171041,0.03546192,0.002741916,0.3500712,0.001586804,0.0004939872,0.0001046803,0.0001033483,0.2923321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691359,0.006966627,0.0006796246,0.01446586,0.0002233927,0.0001902626,0.00001708324,0.00005759808,0.00826347],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7512651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9433064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007692216344188165,"score_gpt":0.2808461517693309,"score_spread":0.2731539354251427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}