{"id":"W6958752118","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3636053_d1","title":"Additional file 1: of Rationale, design, and methods for Canadian alliance for healthy hearts and minds cohort study (CAHHM) â a Pan Canadian cohort study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohort study; Alliance; Cohort; Epidemiology; Qualitative research; Retrospective cohort study","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01018832,0.001795931,0.002021751,0.003081867,0.003840743,0.002141479,0.00297311,0.001864318,0.690403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09526462,0.00160862,0.001625032,0.00475726,0.000915203,0.001828255,0.001042015,0.001957785,0.07303986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003577327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01061912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09375657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1449759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966431,0.001119916,0.000590217,0.0007367885,0.0005470773,0.0003628378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486253,0.03260631,0.002545978,0.005795235,0.008538592,0.001888591],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001036473,0.0001769692,0.004445589,0.001943848,0.0001199397,0.00005722502,0.000213489,0.0002644979,0.00005609229,0.001452554,0.9817064,0.008526863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02646839,0.001089328,0.06022315,0.0127351,0.001428837,0.0007445532,0.001642833,0.00275392,0.0008916559,0.02170758,0.8698558,0.0004587682],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007392521,0.00009157324,0.002180369,0.0004090317,0.0002181124,0.006231076,0.9869744,0.0001976869,0.002958515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03958721,0.0008736239,0.03426297,0.005151686,0.000981299,0.2429961,0.6184583,0.001475402,0.05621331],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9062434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4416025,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04935567164857913,"score_gpt":0.3183685301789621,"score_spread":0.2690128585303829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}