{"id":"W6958774093","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.1961183.v1","title":"Places and People: Rhetorical Constructions of “Community” in a Canadian Environmental Risk Assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal and Regulatory Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Risk assessment; Discourse analysis; Government (linguistics); Environmental impact assessment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001445382,0.0000893931,0.0001950608,0.0001872173,0.0002056596,0.00002262201,0.0001469071,0.0002173433,0.1591226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001499469,0.00008310455,0.00003543353,0.0001798062,0.00007000387,0.00004219123,0.00004674107,0.0002948768,0.00006153808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002656305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006715822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.704726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9751744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991112,0.0003394107,0.0001015838,0.00008752258,0.0001929146,0.0001673588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994724,0.00005846212,0.0001126259,0.0001230595,0.000009037503,0.0002244525],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[5.289257e-7,0.00002535247,0.008740566,0.00002826288,0.00004331662,0.000002268736,0.003620346,0.000002343849,2.13702e-7,0.00005401514,0.9869658,0.000516957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008513149,0.000008958989,0.009448122,0.0001731371,0.00002238899,7.2842e-7,0.004174714,0.000006629696,2.113271e-7,0.00003779119,0.9859421,0.0001001083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001336385,0.0006673997,2.251594e-8,0.0001124063,0.00006919164,0.0001804129,0.2863872,0.00002211107,0.7112248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018122,0.0001826609,0.00006865298,0.00004176099,0.0003588822,0.0000773916,0.04505058,0.0001026633,0.2523052],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7004758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8416461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02562633961183563,"score_gpt":0.2948759541506575,"score_spread":0.2692496145388219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}