{"id":"W6958774093","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.1961183.v1","title":"Places and People: Rhetorical Constructions of “Community” in a Canadian Environmental Risk Assessment","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Legal and Regulatory Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Risk assessment; Discourse analysis; Government (linguistics); Environmental impact assessment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006220547,0.0006898624,0.00041236,0.003757027,0.02917881,0.01466375,0.00303498,0.005003182,0.02062437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01309999,0.0004189035,0.000579213,0.005906789,0.02565264,0.00501104,0.004933945,0.006835029,0.0008296848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1016653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1126972,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946198,0.001496322,0.0001222138,0.0004546716,0.00243426,0.0008725587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925076,0.003851249,0.0001766763,0.0003436925,0.002667102,0.0004537253],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001264482,0.000006898993,0.0004653919,0.0000403966,0.000005131288,0.00007018072,0.03353425,0.0002315795,0.00009387905,0.917846,0.03756909,0.01012463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002202008,0.00000741817,0.003789655,0.0004201846,0.00004981932,0.00008645151,0.06471363,0.001064565,0.0004084936,0.1634231,0.7659378,0.00007680281],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02556493,0.00238111,0.00699605,0.06747779,0.0004490007,0.00005341921,0.0004311779,0.0001031811,0.8965433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7653199,0.002286025,0.005765744,0.007733526,0.0001879455,0.00008443741,0.0002227992,0.0002980246,0.2181015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7376367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02562633961183563,"score_gpt":0.2948759541506575,"score_spread":0.2692496145388219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}