{"id":"W6958981985","doi":"10.7916/cjel.v41i3.3727","title":"Public Interest Standing and Judicial Review of Environmental Matters: A Comparative Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Judicial review; Doctrine; Government (linguistics); National Environmental Policy Act; Public trust doctrine; Legislation; Commonwealth; Environmental law; Harm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03432113,0.0003767682,0.0008502573,0.007327261,0.01268833,0.02211345,0.00301387,0.01763242,0.008624574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06186301,0.0006057055,0.0009423457,0.006781509,0.02681718,0.01917499,0.005030735,0.007726338,0.0009489369],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02865169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0198927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01755358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02627419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9538014,0.02890952,0.001212498,0.002030599,0.009558,0.00448789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9206482,0.06122715,0.002732463,0.00264829,0.0116712,0.001072743],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005778983,0.00001463689,0.0001030453,0.00004548857,0.000004364427,0.0001020707,0.001452306,0.0001737999,0.00002195875,0.9861806,0.007582133,0.004313726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007049408,0.00009427519,0.002484635,0.001270905,0.0000605699,0.0004328763,0.008643015,0.001898118,0.0003276654,0.5634006,0.4212324,0.00008446865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01568411,0.05787617,0.01048753,0.09839974,0.001739774,0.0001352039,0.00006665463,0.00004393254,0.8155669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8581792,0.04147009,0.006065244,0.03059671,0.006673681,0.0005000418,0.00009600605,0.0001008391,0.05631806],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03432113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2078835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07551116321362354,"score_gpt":0.2693721057204494,"score_spread":0.1938609425068258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}