{"id":"W6958981985","doi":"10.7916/cjel.v41i3.3727","title":"Public Interest Standing and Judicial Review of Environmental Matters: A Comparative Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Judicial review; Doctrine; Government (linguistics); National Environmental Policy Act; Public trust doctrine; Legislation; Commonwealth; Environmental law; Harm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000459473,0.0001302631,0.0004513573,0.0001044802,0.0004793591,0.00007531014,0.0005748327,0.0002049598,0.001866814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002477048,0.0002302696,0.0001092589,0.0004234818,0.001000347,0.0004822809,0.0003993368,0.000500706,0.00005140209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004468535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00930165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02884338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998199,0.0004438868,0.0002798409,0.0003660927,0.0003069238,0.0004041985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990616,0.0001655793,0.0002488343,0.0002523136,0.00001456054,0.0002571191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005867775,0.000481879,0.8730793,0.00140741,0.0002566916,0.0000159326,0.007304853,8.269787e-7,0.001631871,0.04175049,0.06913402,0.004878037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001059811,0.0001422322,0.05512698,0.001342703,0.0001334514,0.000007032352,0.009459978,0.00001833686,0.000009605605,0.0004081238,0.9317968,0.0004949507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.837228,0.001617382,0.00001324818,0.001479826,0.0001174259,0.001014157,0.0001721168,0.00005063082,0.1583072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796448,0.006175817,0.00008709827,0.0006009834,0.00005463738,0.000002777042,0.00002386815,0.00001335132,0.01339669],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8626628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990456,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07551116321362354,"score_gpt":0.2693721057204494,"score_spread":0.1938609425068258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}