{"id":"W6960009627","doi":"10.1111/eva.12247/full","title":"Identifying designatable units for intraspecific conservation prioritization: a hierarchical approach applied to the lake whitefish species complex (Coregonus spp.)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Alberta Innovates; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Mitacs","keywords":"Intraspecific competition; Species complex; Identification (biology); Extinction (optical mineralogy); Phylogeography; Adaptation (eye); Biogeography; Range (aeronautics); Conservation biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002912792,0.0004608998,0.0006581528,0.00532545,0.002354731,0.002426723,0.001177248,0.0005112611,0.00202049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009912111,0.0002748687,0.0007675575,0.003275103,0.001522143,0.0009764726,0.002361807,0.0007030958,0.0001811657],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003976066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003713579,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05104497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1361247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975234,0.001056967,0.0002338023,0.00057793,0.0003402647,0.0002677207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956719,0.001491319,0.001029526,0.0004508564,0.0009994414,0.0003570822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005914176,0.0002548924,0.5756176,0.001085609,0.0007463934,0.0004043382,0.0131207,0.02046934,0.03387435,0.024107,0.00280966,0.3269187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001440068,0.0006253169,0.7511154,0.0004251948,0.0008451139,0.0004831174,0.01537728,0.1718449,0.006967756,0.03527779,0.01666514,0.000228878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.762884,0.0007599234,0.2264927,0.0005101274,0.00003017792,0.001032661,0.0007833983,0.0003589212,0.007148126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8354908,0.00006110132,0.1627737,0.00005969411,0.000008265049,0.000329435,0.0005184695,0.00004660159,0.0007119742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05104497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1014957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0962847905791194,"score_gpt":0.2140250902628898,"score_spread":0.1177402996837704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}