{"id":"W6960444376","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0201924.t002","title":"Abundance of the four tick species that were most highly submitted from humans and animals in the passive surveillance program in Québec, from 2007 to 2015: Number of &lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;cookei&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;D&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;variabilis&lt;/i&gt;, &lt;i&gt;A&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;americanum&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;R&lt;/i&gt;. &lt;i&gt;sanguineus&lt;/i&gt;.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Agricultural pest management studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tick; Abundance (ecology); Tick-borne disease; Disease transmission; Animal species","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008651782,0.001020663,0.001033669,0.003626486,0.001043378,0.001525067,0.002187645,0.0009322061,0.0357433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007382156,0.0003950536,0.0009409595,0.006565459,0.0003166593,0.0006952533,0.000953114,0.001100807,0.01097419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006709438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01231822,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9214352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9543496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993781,0.00005384107,0.00007816993,0.0001838053,0.0001583673,0.0001477665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995461,0.0008443216,0.0003899617,0.0003730763,0.002561155,0.000370537],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000842397,0.00001144245,0.01713989,0.001029344,0.0001043335,0.00002619088,0.00004145227,0.0004314813,0.00006104571,0.0003206425,0.9770581,0.003691882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004431877,0.00002844124,0.246552,0.002276316,0.0002463887,0.0001086039,0.000436855,0.001952923,0.0004078889,0.0007097629,0.7467476,0.00009021421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002634757,0.00008803155,0.00001764211,0.00004322431,0.000009877102,0.000004268141,0.9991546,0.00004493378,0.0003740046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003484126,0.000141956,0.0001490202,0.00005798901,0.000007328495,0.00003155816,0.995127,0.00002778223,0.0009732388],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07856476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1580548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02222011178833763,"score_gpt":0.24233720939607,"score_spread":0.2201170976077323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}