{"id":"W6964832177","doi":"10.3389/fnagi.2022.1046066.s001","title":"Image_1_Systematic evaluation of urinary formic acid as a new potential biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease.PDF","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formic acid; Urinary system; Biomarker; Formaldehyde; Urine; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002635226,0.0007472233,0.001010922,0.005578396,0.0003813852,0.00293557,0.001411181,0.001946103,0.2285302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01011491,0.0004044448,0.001867309,0.002828536,0.0003630087,0.002090288,0.00129434,0.0008945772,0.0460753],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007665374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001582557,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002693902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003730446,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.0002005347,0.00006570939,0.00008111844,0.000276943,0.00006834292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946916,0.001690723,0.00061375,0.0003814584,0.002181519,0.0004408714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008015952,0.00004976259,0.003338667,0.006418638,0.000182149,0.0001836988,0.00004602366,0.0001185339,0.0009152598,0.0006605395,0.8164502,0.170835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007301606,0.0003683637,0.02292361,0.00537389,0.000486538,0.001572681,0.0001135123,0.0009650003,0.001659936,0.001791109,0.9639386,0.00007655386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.01652714,0.1083729,0.01701123,0.05752261,0.02477396,0.007189942,0.4875864,0.02429566,0.2567201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1286944,0.09686007,0.08823985,0.03442845,0.05235554,0.007252232,0.3105456,0.007365378,0.2742585],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2285302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7645098,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06972982495504305,"score_gpt":0.2885696613526026,"score_spread":0.2188398363975596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}