{"id":"W6966961347","doi":"10.5061/dryad.6g53s","title":"Data from: Quantifying relative fish abundance with eDNA: a promising tool for fisheries management","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Catch per unit effort; Biomass (ecology); Relative species abundance; Trout; Environmental DNA; Fishing; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00331768,0.0004705898,0.0005743705,0.0029546,0.0001909823,0.00085522,0.0006087669,0.0005832724,0.01087879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008650932,0.0002159261,0.000202607,0.003594786,0.0003143139,0.001145823,0.0009058935,0.0004227528,0.002791663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004289827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004934845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001841405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004554287,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983599,0.0004237123,0.0003308388,0.0003341467,0.0005268977,0.00002450387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934403,0.002215734,0.002123649,0.000531045,0.00152326,0.0001660671],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001017755,0.0001102193,0.2756023,0.006033615,0.0004034102,0.0001285683,0.0003183762,0.001306338,0.04639801,0.001880729,0.01244231,0.6543584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001153485,0.0009255817,0.8085563,0.001871698,0.0003899274,0.0004445439,0.001065668,0.004646952,0.0325177,0.00652142,0.1427611,0.0001837903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.4323151,0.02295989,0.2109619,0.006071707,0.001268037,0.001547633,0.2747329,0.002932477,0.04721046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6714591,0.009449721,0.2357748,0.00252004,0.0006390191,0.001756274,0.05711031,0.0003520432,0.02093867],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01087879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03639323,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06141042540250004,"score_gpt":0.2656803495065099,"score_spread":0.2042699241040098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}