{"id":"W6976993973","doi":"10.60692/hymf4-byh26","title":"ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF VIEWS UNDER THE CONSIDERATIONS OF HISTORICAL URBAN LANDSCAPE (HUL). CASE STUDY CUENCA, ECUADOR","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Latin American Urban Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Vulnerability (computing); Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Element (criminal law); Urban planning; Fragility; Urban landscape","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008351975,0.00009070431,0.0003728892,0.0001976074,0.0002684833,0.00005414242,0.00007640372,0.00003524666,0.00007091837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002852959,0.0000583048,0.00007904929,0.0005261895,0.0001018769,0.0002429481,0.00004885107,0.00005922584,0.00001160263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001673325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009618733,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001482481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984888,0.0003102763,0.0006049408,0.00009714322,0.0003830857,0.0001157099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988064,0.00009780481,0.0005448365,0.0002608918,0.0002479878,0.00004214352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001855973,0.000004637647,0.7944602,0.00002817686,0.0002195493,0.000002160389,0.2047218,0.00009506271,1.27248e-7,0.0002915754,0.0001406188,0.00003417618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000393745,0.00006706558,0.3297334,0.00001204136,0.00036431,0.00001123739,0.6685011,0.0006882339,0.000002687031,9.884413e-7,0.0001392569,0.00008588155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870884,0.00001361699,0.0008392183,0.00008912307,0.0001203105,0.0006315828,0.00002241536,0.00002488881,0.01117047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995469,3.714648e-7,0.0001522116,0.00003734863,0.0000206271,0.00003179641,0.000001247808,0.000002657965,0.0002067921],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4647268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2559926,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05749084810105488,"score_gpt":0.3005163613763322,"score_spread":0.2430255132752773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}