{"id":"W6976993973","doi":"10.60692/hymf4-byh26","title":"ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT OF VIEWS UNDER THE CONSIDERATIONS OF HISTORICAL URBAN LANDSCAPE (HUL). CASE STUDY CUENCA, ECUADOR","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Latin American Urban Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Vulnerability (computing); Product (mathematics); Process (computing); Element (criminal law); Urban planning; Fragility; Urban landscape","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001079643,0.0002773918,0.0001498447,0.002558555,0.00292698,0.002132549,0.0007852868,0.0005279213,0.005013295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002682533,0.0001211681,0.0001619082,0.002613577,0.001703108,0.0009584767,0.001534328,0.0003608383,0.0001676769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005508872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00108813,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05327304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09334677,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992587,0.0003935295,0.00002997429,0.00007556536,0.00009635957,0.0001457625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992055,0.0003492682,0.000125538,0.00004939222,0.0001949393,0.00007530223],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002951325,0.0004831218,0.1562967,0.001126838,0.00006377965,0.04608522,0.579777,0.001884104,0.004265238,0.0307535,0.007944622,0.1710249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009498857,0.00009333669,0.1022779,0.0002710261,0.00003110548,0.002049386,0.8439365,0.0009163167,0.001171792,0.0009185902,0.04830598,0.00001861003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725338,0.0004056067,0.0004985585,0.0003935146,0.00001098022,0.00009452747,0.0001559324,0.000006672283,0.02590038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951162,0.0003017304,0.0006850772,0.00003360588,0.00000458125,0.00004889086,0.00009075552,0.000004454823,0.00371461],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05327304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1059259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05749084810105488,"score_gpt":0.3005163613763322,"score_spread":0.2430255132752773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}