{"id":"W6977322717","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.26596109","title":"Additional file 1 of Clinical effects of Emblica officinalis fruit consumption on cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Groundwater flow and contamination studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Disease; Risk factor; Risk assessment; Emblica officinalis; Epidemiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003617759,0.00133966,0.002466555,0.00355566,0.0005492163,0.001520949,0.001677669,0.001409143,0.8247995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04755602,0.0008181647,0.002962773,0.006115218,0.000296347,0.002262,0.001117729,0.0008689607,0.04100066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001177104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002957671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004398357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01033343,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998607,0.0003713517,0.0004492565,0.0002557335,0.0002026556,0.0001141006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538599,0.03919184,0.003265798,0.0009129956,0.002436287,0.0003331233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002544569,0.0001505263,0.002647595,0.3077268,0.002086441,0.0001524017,0.000156624,0.0009604582,0.000348064,0.002235801,0.6586109,0.02237984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06329215,0.001347875,0.04328114,0.1013198,0.01319619,0.001059187,0.0005938446,0.003611737,0.001242405,0.02113844,0.7495322,0.0003852107],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003674683,0.0005079691,0.0003614946,0.0002643173,0.00005570458,0.0005821642,0.996761,0.0001833471,0.0009165452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03208079,0.004101843,0.01753302,0.003241662,0.0006031981,0.04034719,0.8684385,0.0009814093,0.03267233],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8247995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2499023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07298137435391043,"score_gpt":0.2977673246229024,"score_spread":0.224785950268992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}