{"id":"W6977518295","doi":"10.60770/3td4-c102","title":"A jurisprudential analysis of the Canadian defence of voluntary intoxication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MRU-Repo","topic":"Historical and Scientific Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitutionality; Jurisprudence; Appeal; Criminal code; Criminal law; Harm; Dissenting opinion","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001625779,0.00004103336,0.0001536873,0.0002052517,0.00007632641,0.000005863324,0.0000785564,0.00002822975,0.0001715052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008855383,0.00002551151,0.0001541998,0.00126031,0.0001080811,0.00001638721,0.00002614666,0.00006133763,0.00001195204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000125214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001743006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0753353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2161593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993509,0.00001458959,0.0001802404,0.0001326176,0.0002304071,0.00009124444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995829,0.00002708111,0.00003520002,0.0002209386,0.00007545427,0.00005840118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007788032,0.0003131263,0.7278464,0.0007916842,0.005456358,0.0001083496,0.02685778,0.0001332811,0.0623989,0.006783603,0.1416592,0.0275734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126298,0.00005661352,0.8749926,0.0001277952,0.003311929,0.000007250008,0.0002325318,0.004151601,0.007271453,0.0001432481,0.109479,0.00009967684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855506,0.001184588,0.00009504306,0.001821273,0.0006708639,0.0001106661,0.00003083507,0.00001433436,0.01052184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964277,0.00001025262,0.00005036838,0.00006397141,0.00003773754,0.000003941198,0.00000664472,0.000002405439,0.003397041],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1471462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9308221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01846268610057155,"score_gpt":0.2728375873294157,"score_spread":0.2543749012288442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}