{"id":"W6977603934","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7485455","title":"Do authors of systematic reviews of epidemiological observational studies assess the methodologies of the included primary studies? An empirical examination of methodological tool use in the literature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Observational study; Systematic review; Data extraction; Scopus; MEDLINE; Sample (material); Epidemiology; Descriptive statistics; Meta-analysis; Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.809586,0.00272436,0.01245812,0.04188831,0.004143968,0.0263889,0.009189177,0.008317647,0.003834904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9630087,0.007601408,0.01168561,0.05449825,0.01580522,0.03482668,0.01425337,0.007410909,0.001293218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02232565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03136912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004097234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004468938,"domain_scores_codex":[0.04959945,0.6323554,0.2428009,0.01415625,0.05946254,0.001625448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01430793,0.7750698,0.1262114,0.03025591,0.05345697,0.0006979174],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002363642,0.0001714375,0.07478769,0.5265027,0.05533516,0.0003542256,0.07325037,0.001780303,0.0007340456,0.03243283,0.009480508,0.2228071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002635861,0.001031007,0.03744378,0.8018262,0.03105504,0.00114703,0.02178822,0.003942778,0.001994894,0.05457171,0.04182075,0.0007427382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05320836,0.6569204,0.1759171,0.06164826,0.007949463,0.02667006,0.004989581,0.0005018086,0.01219502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5354484,0.1655578,0.2061786,0.01898366,0.003003584,0.06731411,0.002214326,0.0005396425,0.0007599524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.190414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2348145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7244187958470023,"score_gpt":0.5782379162446738,"score_spread":0.1461808796023285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}