{"id":"W6981004662","doi":"","title":"Determining the pertinence and feasibility of peer support interventions for type 2 diabetes in Montreal: A scoping review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Perspective (graphical); Peer support; Type 2 diabetes; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; Service (business); Social support","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061379,0.001306018,0.004113225,0.01115834,0.002923162,0.008553339,0.00476952,0.002655607,0.005830882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2411063,0.001157666,0.004084835,0.01687054,0.002675225,0.003587386,0.003791391,0.001911036,0.0003956108],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04261024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1684684,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6147111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7350349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9649854,0.01681455,0.006495354,0.001770231,0.008419561,0.001515006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8426681,0.09943226,0.01385808,0.002928011,0.03882204,0.00229158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001102663,0.0002135805,0.01190334,0.49969,0.008035478,0.0002287443,0.006708722,0.0007304785,0.0005600734,0.00411797,0.01591616,0.4507928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004541665,0.0004338228,0.03493468,0.8770557,0.01588207,0.00008790929,0.00362387,0.0003659417,0.0007172605,0.0006958148,0.06562316,0.0001257108],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103976,0.9684243,0.001122352,0.006514403,0.0007784984,0.003820528,0.002089251,0.00005107994,0.006802038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1212323,0.8592959,0.006899054,0.002453728,0.0003407668,0.006689663,0.001871614,0.00004630785,0.001170575],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3852889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7751158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08477812126302098,"score_gpt":0.3729299648773491,"score_spread":0.2881518436143282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}