{"id":"W6982267418","doi":"","title":"IDENTIFYING SITUATIONAL FACTORS FOR IS\\nDEVELOPMENT PROCESSES: APPLYING THE\\nMETHOD-IN-ACTION FRAMEWORK","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Systems","topic":"Ancient Near East History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"Stiftelsen för Kunskaps- och Kompetensutveckling","keywords":"Situational ethics; Order (exchange); Information system; Situation awareness; Situation analysis; Method engineering; Subject (documents)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03722453,0.001492387,0.0007328221,0.006050277,0.005013252,0.01184927,0.001627636,0.002299535,0.003052517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05040376,0.001080089,0.001510009,0.00259373,0.01287153,0.01146367,0.006748278,0.002512906,0.0003224706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007493815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007553086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00780103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9426063,0.04280797,0.003101371,0.003980585,0.005932811,0.001571001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941353,0.04354048,0.005810285,0.003725877,0.004278277,0.001292082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002945432,0.000613204,0.05655523,0.002351825,0.0002618505,0.0008852672,0.1299765,0.01231759,0.003986912,0.5664617,0.002116871,0.2241783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001953983,0.0004959166,0.03195351,0.002310333,0.000348247,0.00123812,0.1125255,0.1006064,0.01039092,0.6624903,0.07712473,0.0003207144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07975012,0.0005371625,0.87043,0.004527075,0.00007423372,0.001686805,0.0001496238,0.0004236038,0.04242146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6247829,0.0002692034,0.3728067,0.0001153411,0.00001423257,0.0007609971,0.0001404393,0.00005418426,0.001056034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03722453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1968645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1203768955976071,"score_gpt":0.2871417684760005,"score_spread":0.1667648728783934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}