{"id":"W6987381494","doi":"","title":"Surface impedance formulation for electric field integral equation in magneto-quasistatic and full-wave boundary element models of interconnects","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Boundary element method; Electric-field integral equation; Discretization; Integral equation; Electrical impedance; Conductor; Surface (topology); Method of moments (probability theory); Boundary value problem; Boundary (topology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004339094,0.0007931265,0.0006335356,0.0005373555,0.0003137436,0.001261539,0.0009631403,0.001693702,0.003519903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001171839,0.0002979931,0.000934988,0.0005889443,0.0007165178,0.001595115,0.0009339053,0.001439329,0.00157528],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006040582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005687542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001460074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009973643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996835,0.0001025995,0.00001336596,0.00003938449,0.000135244,0.00002593875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997696,0.0000974063,0.00002569349,0.00003049823,0.00006733921,0.000009437049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342175,0.00006106841,0.0004712771,0.0002804222,0.00002926372,0.0002894792,0.0004241686,0.3467073,0.01706226,0.5959828,0.00332464,0.03533388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008029132,0.00002505893,0.0001125309,0.00002833585,0.000007307639,0.0001008209,0.00004995742,0.9270947,0.001089371,0.06113904,0.01033426,0.00001052086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004274863,0.001136218,0.9830434,0.0003953414,0.0001262024,0.0000303068,0.0000773217,0.0001073522,0.01080901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.523643,0.006762481,0.3940534,0.001014996,0.0006074213,0.0006316414,0.0006106608,0.000451996,0.07222446],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003519903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0117752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01357211317002125,"score_gpt":0.2193387290708465,"score_spread":0.2057666159008252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}