{"id":"W6989764184","doi":"","title":"The Canadian 'Model Forest' approach: A Way Forward for Tasmania","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Forest management; Biodiversity; Community forestry; Public policy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00358157,0.0003723499,0.0004239298,0.000958347,0.01028246,0.006318965,0.002241415,0.002941687,0.009437992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004046916,0.0002782102,0.0007367304,0.001687372,0.003897937,0.003572072,0.00243116,0.00488765,0.0005208041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06519861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2626635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974096,0.0004530152,0.00006016029,0.0001722521,0.0008631575,0.001041782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960627,0.0002318876,0.00009658092,0.000135002,0.002076015,0.001397769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008267003,0.0001288958,0.007576707,0.0003886089,0.00005874731,0.0009752912,0.006128527,0.002450197,0.00117033,0.3293921,0.4966146,0.1550333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003788148,0.00005215986,0.01175119,0.0005371189,0.0000474011,0.0002300589,0.00919294,0.002509758,0.0002779572,0.02914196,0.9461294,0.00009202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02651312,0.01535466,0.01259056,0.808426,0.005109757,0.0002689015,0.0005404393,0.000438616,0.130758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5302292,0.03203258,0.09119999,0.1746461,0.001132388,0.0004234159,0.0007063083,0.0003073943,0.1693226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06519861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4730512,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01796504202253521,"score_gpt":0.2160016834013662,"score_spread":0.198036641378831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}