{"id":"W6990125704","doi":"","title":"Content analysis and evaluation of scientific productions in the subject area of organic food: A scientometric study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin); Web of science; Scientific literature; Organic farming; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Food processing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01793227,0.0004784468,0.001578999,0.1160208,0.001583487,0.005324851,0.0008534014,0.0006690813,0.003688351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09011047,0.000265181,0.001786656,0.1629631,0.001752282,0.003268777,0.002543824,0.0004521085,0.0004917216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004511891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00538068,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002621734,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9792205,0.004825896,0.004314921,0.001309282,0.009657998,0.000671534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8845897,0.07799841,0.01518694,0.003966681,0.01668836,0.001569978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000330311,0.0002981122,0.7306162,0.01010911,0.001139661,0.0006555595,0.01577505,0.001931682,0.001369358,0.00922378,0.006472369,0.2220788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005165759,0.0003126749,0.9186859,0.001804163,0.0009806046,0.0009723741,0.03026363,0.008014654,0.001537004,0.007801363,0.02945652,0.0001194905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468341,0.005253505,0.007341939,0.001444799,0.0000970401,0.001601987,0.01132864,0.0002045934,0.02589338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802577,0.002920354,0.008418363,0.000057374,0.0001201523,0.001112414,0.005884454,0.00003575101,0.001193424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8839792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094836,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.421832382022364,"score_gpt":0.5074340688229564,"score_spread":0.08560168680059238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}