{"id":"W6996140706","doi":"","title":"Regional Geology and Resource Potential of the Chezacut Map Area, Central British Columbia (NTS 093C/08)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Regional planning; Regional studies; Regional development","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018621,0.0003599444,0.0002383053,0.003236059,0.001266891,0.001447845,0.001047179,0.0002816485,0.03738815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001033485,0.0002909184,0.0001826313,0.007278807,0.0002104879,0.0003797743,0.0005234279,0.000410744,0.004772696],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01675131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974597,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998183,0.0000110664,0.00000794818,0.00002099657,0.00008566435,0.00005600614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993801,0.00003000213,0.00002203516,0.00002525503,0.0004639451,0.00007859288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002433069,0.0001237653,0.09826495,0.0004540257,0.00005392384,0.0005341547,0.001491983,0.002358101,0.001063307,0.003782338,0.7850972,0.1065328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006372015,0.00001858269,0.6823839,0.0002219755,0.00005642193,0.0001583689,0.004781451,0.003795652,0.001342832,0.0005928854,0.3065308,0.00005348833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1530976,0.0008412647,0.0006771811,0.0009581594,0.00006616642,0.0003084897,0.5338831,0.0006128536,0.3095552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3277487,0.001474396,0.003711788,0.0002033311,0.00001773995,0.0003088061,0.1752425,0.0004039675,0.4908888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03738815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1250758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005876966070948925,"score_gpt":0.1575885692733289,"score_spread":0.15171160320238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}