{"id":"W6996954096","doi":"","title":"Theoretical approaches to literacy: Evidence from America, Canada, England, Singapore, Senegal, Indonesia and Iran’s curriculum","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Ideology; Literacy; Context (archaeology); Critical literacy; Dimension (graph theory); Population; State (computer science)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008029794,0.000235554,0.000493699,0.0001986034,0.000595793,0.001441304,0.00159796,0.00009468263,0.001598567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006800076,0.0001733032,0.00008481367,0.0009054936,0.0004130886,0.001530753,0.0002833372,0.0002822386,0.000004665948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002470942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007604292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7099133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05763042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973784,0.0003023831,0.0005131715,0.0003868983,0.0009408562,0.0004782906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981262,0.0003991071,0.0003474245,0.0002595651,0.0002193415,0.0006483461],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000200727,0.0004976355,0.7702594,0.0000334105,0.0001448758,0.0000432244,0.0162442,0.0002597152,0.001678891,0.01946154,0.07731906,0.1138573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001742062,0.00001464694,0.9443907,0.0003158691,0.00003964129,0.000005184146,0.00185023,0.00007574928,0.0002083132,0.02302221,0.02955209,0.0003512261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9743234,0.009538766,0.00004764516,0.01066264,0.0004387651,0.0003664307,0.00005327893,0.00001664155,0.004552451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937552,0.003255423,0.0003482031,0.001939847,0.0005493738,0.00001305051,0.000009421272,0.00001257325,0.0001168645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6522829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2368049697051965,"score_gpt":0.5186933250623005,"score_spread":0.281888355357104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}