{"id":"W6999326693","doi":"","title":"Comparing wetland sampling methods for floristic quality assessment in Superior, Wisconsin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Floristics; Quality assessment; Sampling (signal processing); Species diversity; Plant community; Indicator species; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008394152,0.001027601,0.003462356,0.001566988,0.0006051832,0.00007265826,0.00107324,0.001040036,0.0007990869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007839628,0.001366112,0.0009190954,0.0007175562,0.001193122,0.0004939684,0.001232382,0.001291832,0.0001044207],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004249342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004194558,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02200342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04311239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933327,0.001210368,0.001377807,0.001748556,0.001125783,0.001204731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932216,0.001683392,0.001973693,0.001594637,0.001117225,0.000409481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006021209,0.003444738,0.7523369,0.0117141,0.006969692,0.0009554456,0.02740495,0.000483552,0.050114,0.004031315,0.04411321,0.09241088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01333139,0.0006887612,0.5323918,0.004347717,0.004398778,0.0004166203,0.01611096,0.003782188,0.001301775,0.002090611,0.415457,0.005682408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8353279,0.002732541,0.09651952,0.0001918301,0.002981103,0.004867801,0.002863674,0.0003257043,0.05418999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4922439,0.0004084857,0.4986177,0.00001754657,0.00028921,0.00001603292,0.00191364,0.0003868741,0.006106551],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4020982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3368751617775479,"score_gpt":0.43142106992929,"score_spread":0.09454590815174208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}