{"id":"W6999326693","doi":"","title":"Comparing wetland sampling methods for floristic quality assessment in Superior, Wisconsin","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Floristics; Quality assessment; Sampling (signal processing); Species diversity; Plant community; Indicator species; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01387679,0.0004018124,0.0002945965,0.002382964,0.000843385,0.001280979,0.0006367418,0.0002595762,0.0008936623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01531653,0.0003258261,0.000535865,0.002269128,0.0005388144,0.0007739368,0.0014572,0.0003034481,0.0001741507],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003117238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002238366,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1692964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4291756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9946873,0.001940181,0.0005037504,0.0006603593,0.001893364,0.0003149878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928614,0.002017003,0.001138646,0.0006217959,0.002898231,0.0004628595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001039626,0.0001575768,0.8775274,0.0002698575,0.0003136411,0.00007405873,0.002801757,0.002135559,0.007095347,0.0007292686,0.001201693,0.1066543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002486685,0.0006717771,0.9858565,0.0001237152,0.0001607405,0.0000514735,0.001626003,0.00405635,0.002026457,0.000156469,0.005217914,0.00002772855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811597,0.00101976,0.01160423,0.0001326429,0.00005403523,0.0004078379,0.001005808,0.00006976898,0.004546299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590952,0.00125729,0.03488591,0.0001254069,0.00002965501,0.0006486833,0.002285462,0.00004048168,0.001632004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1692964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3366219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3368751617775479,"score_gpt":0.43142106992929,"score_spread":0.09454590815174208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}