{"id":"W7000340716","doi":"","title":"Evaluating the efficiency and effectiveness of environmental policies for global and local air pollutants","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California, San Diego; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; HEC Montréal; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Greenhouse gas; Emissions trading; Empirical evidence; Carbon price; Context (archaeology); Carbon offset; Air pollution","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01044969,0.0007701211,0.000854068,0.001672287,0.0005674398,0.00303501,0.0009381384,0.001434853,0.002973941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02733103,0.0002831722,0.001039189,0.002813193,0.001662002,0.003812537,0.0008938864,0.001174955,0.0004024405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004029117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003875072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01320739,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9899414,0.006470201,0.000449492,0.0007638348,0.001672552,0.0007025471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713837,0.02071599,0.004108639,0.001449363,0.00212465,0.0002177011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00180498,0.002211495,0.1447017,0.001870809,0.002814019,0.000128347,0.0003801763,0.5040057,0.004591738,0.1222184,0.002531852,0.2127407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001123277,0.009926679,0.3698938,0.001270601,0.003634924,0.0001314117,0.005975396,0.3224458,0.03962921,0.2125826,0.03311476,0.0002715196],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.90857,0.004712281,0.01481451,0.002416653,0.0001118067,0.0003523119,0.0007688304,0.00006084389,0.06819279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921201,0.001894334,0.00397951,0.000165598,0.00003567683,0.00005925959,0.0001972693,0.00001305779,0.001535018],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05526394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0514069544114242,"score_gpt":0.2673320048623395,"score_spread":0.2159250504509153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}