{"id":"W7009294344","doi":"","title":"EFFECTIVENESS OF A REGIONAL REPORTING PROGRAM IN IMPROVING QUALITY OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTION CASE REPORTS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"University Library (University of Saskatchewan)","topic":"Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Adverse drug reaction; Drug reaction; Adverse effect; Health professionals; Data collection; Pharmacovigilance; Program evaluation","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.129146,0.0006652682,0.0008737086,0.004855853,0.001306677,0.003434222,0.00363694,0.0007502714,0.001909643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1812272,0.0008012693,0.001158318,0.004243521,0.001398439,0.00318543,0.006208926,0.0009310237,0.0004734038],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008152797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02758677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0518117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06794193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8413773,0.1147723,0.01135493,0.006944894,0.0217509,0.0037997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6302977,0.1370091,0.08038927,0.03978686,0.09994043,0.01257653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004011512,0.003338661,0.3699755,0.002318251,0.0007487615,0.0003651334,0.006400381,0.006686258,0.00813396,0.001424738,0.005175412,0.5914214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009537853,0.01231011,0.9391063,0.001183758,0.0006578818,0.0006000191,0.007186313,0.008945491,0.008942147,0.000313334,0.01954572,0.0002552224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9230141,0.003200385,0.02954091,0.004612472,0.0002426492,0.01363963,0.001411029,0.001656319,0.02268251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9192049,0.001659318,0.07115272,0.000991303,0.0001832822,0.003116045,0.001359638,0.00009710236,0.002235735],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.870854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6829973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05718829929293107,"score_gpt":0.359627350688505,"score_spread":0.3024390513955739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}