{"id":"W7010906483","doi":"","title":"Integrating omic technologies into aquatic ecological risk assessment and environmental monitoring: hurdles, achievements, and future outlook","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University)","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council","keywords":"Toxicogenomics; Government (linguistics); Risk assessment; Environmental risk assessment; Aquatic science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Aquatic environment; Environmental monitoring","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005113202,0.0003055429,0.000299064,0.0002309724,0.0009489783,0.00005936914,0.0004853975,0.0004866498,0.0006635073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008120738,0.0002872883,0.00006170882,0.0002774276,0.002074586,0.000346949,0.001568862,0.001734161,0.00008521051],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005051259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002973513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009263682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008652626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978042,0.0002582002,0.0002324632,0.0007633851,0.0003243087,0.0006174558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989786,0.0002310373,0.0001308456,0.0003713889,0.000002858097,0.0002852413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005948807,0.0003954962,0.8931493,0.00001057017,0.00004491542,0.0001271876,0.0002150868,0.000009248697,0.06522936,0.0004771544,0.00009842482,0.04018373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002290695,0.001176283,0.8785915,0.00001839137,0.00008977112,0.0000743619,0.01167852,0.003096721,0.002741979,0.001916025,0.09760311,0.000722637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950389,0.00006515934,0.00008726103,0.001810111,0.0001786155,0.000443962,0.00003365931,0.0001145086,0.002227859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808381,0.00227796,0.01499286,0.00004554015,0.0001155412,0.00000885552,0.00002271263,0.00002244195,0.001676025],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09750468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006790418040576976,"score_gpt":0.2436160056983545,"score_spread":0.2368255876577775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}