{"id":"W7014700998","doi":"","title":"A review and empirical study of the composite scales of the Das–Naglieri cognitive assessment system","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Neuropsychology; Neuroimaging; Functional neuroimaging; Categorization; Neural correlates of consciousness; Empirical research; Neuropsychological assessment","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01764531,0.001008188,0.00192159,0.01220519,0.0006951126,0.003688319,0.002135356,0.000961092,0.001846509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03849671,0.0006768329,0.001085149,0.01870682,0.002148848,0.003062351,0.001387288,0.001726849,0.0004769721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00405341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007739437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007618091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01118111,"domain_scores_codex":[0.988314,0.004499492,0.002357994,0.001328308,0.003300339,0.0001997885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9540337,0.03340236,0.002870368,0.0008105028,0.008587002,0.000296069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001171107,0.0001192749,0.02017228,0.02532946,0.0003259159,0.0001330683,0.001844156,0.0002073503,0.0003816481,0.006158308,0.007569361,0.937642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008476397,0.0004754501,0.3238994,0.09318948,0.001691046,0.003474973,0.00776562,0.001779485,0.001962546,0.006956633,0.5583435,0.0003771563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004812068,0.9893646,0.00131654,0.000953434,0.0002156962,0.0000717313,0.0002278056,0.00001324129,0.003024943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04910468,0.9419901,0.006828281,0.0005908665,0.000289712,0.0002753361,0.0005221224,0.00002291281,0.0003759423],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01764531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09331846,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4467815574545955,"score_gpt":0.6525720363323081,"score_spread":0.2057904788777126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}