{"id":"W7015634670","doi":"","title":"Systematic review on the content of outcome measurement instruments on scar quality","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delphi method; Scars; Content validity; Quality (philosophy); Patient-reported outcome; Scale (ratio); Delphi; Observer (physics)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03706178,0.001830277,0.01062674,0.01686332,0.001001751,0.003522605,0.002538188,0.002086963,0.006544775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2218779,0.001255391,0.009200972,0.01951317,0.002033409,0.004282956,0.002859022,0.001571476,0.0005135865],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006213584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01590253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007441191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01634001,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9439175,0.02034049,0.02482614,0.002328017,0.007786847,0.0008009773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7683091,0.1826496,0.03167153,0.003205138,0.01352428,0.0006404254],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001609833,0.00001053233,0.0009536785,0.9747971,0.005461395,0.00005027088,0.0003241186,0.0000598604,0.00007123902,0.0002133122,0.0011471,0.01675035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002426569,0.0001108763,0.005868205,0.9385284,0.04428752,0.0001541987,0.0003314731,0.00007073311,0.0001471032,0.0003896955,0.009833684,0.00003557196],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004892156,0.984484,0.001024025,0.0011088,0.0003449632,0.002421041,0.004437969,0.00002920323,0.001257844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0626461,0.9210099,0.002993925,0.002046065,0.0002538415,0.007772095,0.002928647,0.00003954472,0.0003098571],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03706178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1960038,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07999033373471622,"score_gpt":0.2660284962207997,"score_spread":0.1860381624860835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}