{"id":"W7015826964","doi":"","title":"Vandalism as a design consideration in urban parks: A case study of University Village Park","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Public Spaces through Art","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Urban park; Public park; Urban design; Territoriality; Pedestrian","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00247269,0.0002692231,0.0004093711,0.0009001173,0.01085361,0.003405922,0.001493308,0.001518549,0.002144028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005667795,0.0004067976,0.0003516429,0.001490445,0.004256171,0.001416347,0.002203152,0.001101449,0.0001350906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008026317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004250651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3676035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964533,0.002232551,0.0001102399,0.0001743434,0.000502309,0.0005272675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966167,0.001901646,0.0004780913,0.0001565006,0.0003459764,0.0005012304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001028003,0.0007277009,0.08464329,0.0005705394,0.00003681774,0.04575425,0.8284332,0.0009063531,0.001085615,0.006099998,0.003055586,0.02858373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000969531,0.0002759179,0.04074507,0.0001914208,0.00001885077,0.006265939,0.9323699,0.0004921101,0.0003626693,0.0004147383,0.01882792,0.00002566287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947477,0.0002636848,0.0002489724,0.000470761,0.000007715158,0.00005403507,0.00001383281,0.000003318685,0.004189997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997143,0.0004326195,0.0004430486,0.00007705351,0.000003613163,0.00002100988,0.000007918585,0.000003850497,0.001867876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.103067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2049342,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02802003206310527,"score_gpt":0.2747092018034172,"score_spread":0.246689169740312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}