{"id":"W7017550639","doi":"","title":"Assessing Credibility:The Impact of a Motive to Lie and the Embellishmentof Evidence — the Canadian Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Jury Decision Making Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Appeal; Supreme court; Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Forensic psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06407472,0.001443884,0.001436839,0.01278207,0.01877856,0.01775032,0.005747712,0.009599246,0.00657153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2116628,0.0009671233,0.001549979,0.00630411,0.04564308,0.01318048,0.009527537,0.01455454,0.0005203283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1033778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.137457,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8067958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8826262,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9117249,0.03745951,0.002830029,0.003762559,0.03912596,0.005097003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8214764,0.126592,0.008707795,0.003786707,0.03308006,0.006357043],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003068492,0.00008244876,0.01432874,0.0006401566,0.000256094,0.001054823,0.02355261,0.001534547,0.0003096218,0.8563821,0.02316702,0.07838498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000245621,0.0001631136,0.03155957,0.004322227,0.0006760465,0.0009496153,0.02830357,0.005970224,0.0009679076,0.8221643,0.1042045,0.0004733631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06181402,0.05768171,0.04408517,0.3692931,0.002166734,0.0007818053,0.0006389038,0.00008937987,0.4634492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422755,0.01096078,0.01508417,0.0199087,0.0008662544,0.0002121891,0.00009619383,0.00005713979,0.0105391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1932042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7500617,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08612035338318644,"score_gpt":0.3588049195301485,"score_spread":0.272684566146962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}