{"id":"W7025324140","doi":"","title":"Transparency, efficiency, competitiveness and compliance of PPA 2006 &amp;PPR 2008: a case study on BCIC based on KPIs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"BRAC University Institutional Repository (BRAC University)","topic":"Public Procurement and Policy","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Columbia Innovation Council","keywords":"Performance indicator; Procurement; Compliance (psychology); Measure (data warehouse); Degree (music); Quality (philosophy)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01563097,0.0001867847,0.0004593729,0.002822409,0.002674417,0.007783545,0.0008403948,0.001518908,0.00390246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03524069,0.0002126295,0.0003107639,0.006549493,0.002264903,0.003226073,0.00237139,0.002044313,0.0006699759],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01030699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01322162,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03251697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01858684,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849074,0.006714499,0.000852904,0.000737384,0.004853976,0.001933886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9543284,0.02568985,0.007073761,0.002790012,0.008454041,0.001663822],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001191385,0.00270688,0.4168776,0.0008703314,0.0001203484,0.00345156,0.1093381,0.01441136,0.00417528,0.1371935,0.01717078,0.2924929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001003645,0.0009011704,0.7333311,0.0009849953,0.000127939,0.001120067,0.1640204,0.01751129,0.006613201,0.01606372,0.05906881,0.0001568573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9227793,0.0001461155,0.001265792,0.001381203,0.00001241843,0.0001964981,0.0003102877,0.00004540131,0.07386307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962656,0.00006825267,0.0007002891,0.00006459803,0.000004710597,0.00004602699,0.0001887198,0.00001614238,0.002645545],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03251697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0826655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04055563829433616,"score_gpt":0.2523787266701889,"score_spread":0.2118230883758527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}