{"id":"W7027092113","doi":"","title":"Brief of Amici Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), Thirty-Two Technical Experts and Legal Scholars, and Eight Privacy and Transparency Organizations in Support of Respondents, Clapper v. Amnesty International","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa; Georgetown University; Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Amnesty; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Electronic surveillance; Center (category theory); Personally identifiable information; Privacy law; Confidentiality","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000312915,0.0007713253,0.001030725,0.002347166,0.0001120669,0.0002430605,0.001419734,0.000677901,0.001222661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002156377,0.0008409885,0.0001139149,0.001371594,0.0007630105,0.01212513,0.001809585,0.0007083944,0.00002495615],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001837738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006043648,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001071331,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962811,0.0002081837,0.001061392,0.0008972129,0.0007430182,0.0008090264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973112,0.0001119831,0.0009924832,0.001038942,0.0001635721,0.0003817609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001515617,0.002243637,0.5943562,0.000835614,0.0009497988,0.0001055794,0.002633995,0.000003120092,0.001120027,0.05562495,0.3372916,0.003319941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003877255,0.0001248988,0.03420643,0.0004272249,0.0001418821,0.00009042511,0.0001514801,0.00002187793,0.0003729257,0.0002683299,0.9595376,0.0007796934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4795617,0.003647286,0.000554818,0.005156188,0.0008919013,0.005194228,0.02752279,0.001713999,0.4757571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8440338,0.006094827,0.002207131,0.0002510219,0.0002049405,0.000007248092,0.01457726,0.0008962863,0.1317275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.622246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996904,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004117822626164745,"score_gpt":0.1976465665320507,"score_spread":0.1935287439058859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}