{"id":"W7039722067","doi":"","title":"Modality and personal pronouns in political texts: Corpus linguistic analysis of two Canadian political manifestos","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland)","topic":"Fossil Insects in Amber","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Modality (human–computer interaction); Linguistic analysis; Personal pronoun; Corpus linguistics; Discourse analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001762829,0.000198921,0.0005769724,0.000190119,0.00008402888,0.00001965535,0.0002531682,0.0002820897,0.0006495177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001024041,0.0001274638,0.0001918784,0.0004014279,0.0001716168,0.00005706689,0.00004486566,0.0002555763,0.00001735663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001655059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001705104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5411754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8021408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984409,0.00009597441,0.0002406128,0.0004249459,0.000266249,0.0005313729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989903,0.0001841382,0.0001977587,0.0001013625,0.0001694439,0.0003569941],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002341166,0.0001604153,0.9751204,0.0001961173,0.0003842675,0.0001337474,0.002030464,0.000005404834,0.000349367,0.01950991,0.00001580301,0.001859989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002950846,0.0001438898,0.9901953,0.000125306,0.0004823773,0.000007858058,0.004955493,0.002553527,0.00001436038,0.0008234431,0.0001429328,0.0002604701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741333,0.00005887507,0.000001308654,0.0001701251,0.0001214002,0.0001880587,0.0005153864,0.000007341539,0.02480426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944846,0.000003449908,0.00003977011,0.00002969895,0.00004777644,3.171846e-7,0.0005700586,0.00000176491,0.004822541],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2609654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7111763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01584557333894478,"score_gpt":0.2270641357491018,"score_spread":0.211218562410157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}