{"id":"W7071556152","doi":"","title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of the predictive value of four risk assessment instruments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Bivariate analysis; Risk assessment; Predictive value; Checklist; Predictive validity; Predictive power; Test (biology)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03554201,0.003491885,0.01933519,0.01042513,0.000853238,0.004540832,0.002547967,0.002732411,0.005545942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1503815,0.001778296,0.03466824,0.008815199,0.00128179,0.002767297,0.002090484,0.002270177,0.0005826798],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003294526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006181429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006008338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01283714,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9716381,0.01298722,0.00920932,0.002691463,0.002996613,0.0004773197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8801558,0.09903494,0.0123902,0.00306138,0.004892415,0.000465279],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001151116,0.0000211781,0.002623203,0.536685,0.4400701,0.00008676302,0.00009342356,0.0002916646,0.0001223454,0.0002171019,0.001003093,0.01763493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005102942,0.0001502386,0.003041745,0.0693406,0.9234792,0.0001020554,0.00003648181,0.0001208516,0.0001231066,0.0003853639,0.002681877,0.00002811849],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00241978,0.9940823,0.00100775,0.0003195694,0.0002126346,0.0005185158,0.001059629,0.00003626869,0.0003434498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1334258,0.8515486,0.00638785,0.001867062,0.0006116222,0.003306767,0.002313397,0.00009762511,0.0004411895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03554201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1879663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02715954580824588,"score_gpt":0.3044654311619373,"score_spread":0.2773058853536914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}