{"id":"W7073800984","doi":"","title":"Understanding collaborative approaches to research: A synthesis of the research partnership literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"High-pressure geophysics and materials","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Systematic review; Context (archaeology); MEDLINE; Health services research","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1788502,0.001435547,0.00292955,0.04064641,0.01505092,0.04036553,0.003966311,0.004464256,0.004594215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2174548,0.001329111,0.002037255,0.05818914,0.01585825,0.02493348,0.01580007,0.004341677,0.000491395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06492522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1962727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1697067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2906942,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8880419,0.06847404,0.01430365,0.006858415,0.01811925,0.004202764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.672909,0.2590141,0.01251414,0.007849097,0.04397573,0.003737976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001813414,0.00009149741,0.005889494,0.08120309,0.0005652811,0.000889077,0.4380325,0.0007812139,0.0009430714,0.1904022,0.01465089,0.2663704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008167739,0.00009621755,0.009507355,0.1449879,0.001161937,0.0005395532,0.4612569,0.000848757,0.0007698362,0.07148226,0.3091236,0.0001440832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04144226,0.7506192,0.04993513,0.09219054,0.001868004,0.003671328,0.001896014,0.0001829898,0.05819455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4585894,0.4316402,0.088712,0.01092815,0.0005050382,0.005596241,0.00104103,0.0001828011,0.002805091],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8211498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9458618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3089262806671904,"score_gpt":0.328190949774946,"score_spread":0.01926466910775554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}