{"id":"W7075678481","doi":"","title":"A quantitative evaluation of spurious results in the infrared spectroscopic measurement of CO2 isotope ratios","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Theoretical and Computational Physics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Infrared; Isotope; Isotopomers; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Stable isotope ratio","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01408344,0.000975427,0.0008682618,0.001809456,0.00168691,0.002197374,0.001970505,0.002195224,0.002236526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06918891,0.0006978565,0.0006244248,0.002008124,0.00190873,0.002087147,0.001892894,0.0008345529,0.000859701],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009594341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005207508,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005148945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006497545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9826553,0.007768262,0.0008283806,0.002716336,0.005547016,0.0004847077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9145647,0.05896435,0.004931387,0.01303728,0.007678777,0.0008234705],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01186697,0.0009293233,0.2519966,0.001808873,0.0008873675,0.003134061,0.001144394,0.03944302,0.4200714,0.0501837,0.004973984,0.2135603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001927463,0.001031517,0.05916379,0.0000902575,0.0004957648,0.004563011,0.0001566284,0.2672454,0.6403562,0.02064444,0.005893827,0.0001664523],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4303145,0.002420896,0.5512815,0.001225509,0.0004175524,0.0001670776,0.0007033774,0.002633146,0.01083643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9122163,0.0002838047,0.08364461,0.0003822759,0.0001279369,0.00008910558,0.0006191798,0.000500373,0.00213645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01408344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07448125,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04809722508390561,"score_gpt":0.2853221751082708,"score_spread":0.2372249500243652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}