{"id":"W7079457755","doi":"10.26108/vjse-qb75","title":"Food for thought: Science communication and the public understanding of science a case study","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AcadiaU-DEV","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Science communication; Conversation; Publics; Public awareness of science; Public opinion; Genetically modified food; Agency (philosophy); Sociology of scientific knowledge","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02333912,0.0008412664,0.0009181922,0.004668789,0.04808537,0.01439684,0.002933451,0.01068196,0.006124632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04043183,0.0007908304,0.0009676269,0.005938597,0.03719488,0.01212524,0.009343038,0.007938254,0.0006677057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03323245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01987789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1203013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9484403,0.03988642,0.0008110001,0.001355839,0.005421316,0.004085123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9335214,0.053838,0.003945421,0.00166809,0.004320799,0.002706247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043829,0.0001028004,0.002081673,0.000157675,0.000007255767,0.004430849,0.9587682,0.00008742312,0.0002625948,0.02778684,0.002261511,0.004009418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001391682,0.00004243473,0.0007766713,0.0001964289,0.000009732065,0.0007800495,0.9518922,0.000159291,0.0002373351,0.002694211,0.04317348,0.00002424249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8515699,0.003088398,0.002852369,0.04695229,0.0005120716,0.000301365,0.00009200747,0.00004189836,0.09458981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878818,0.001402905,0.001396678,0.001946507,0.00008957288,0.0001695737,0.00003079564,0.00002973051,0.007052417],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2411194,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07587493625009434,"score_gpt":0.2956029790840758,"score_spread":0.2197280428339815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}