{"id":"W7083210346","doi":"10.29173/css340","title":"Review of: VanSledright, B. (2014). Assessing historical thinking & understanding: Innovative designs for new standards. New York, NY: Routledge.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Social Studies","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Historical thinking; Social studies; Research methodology; Critical thinking; Teaching method; Quantitative history","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008346755,0.0002025871,0.0005054753,0.00008818925,0.000688865,0.00005928725,0.0005237468,0.0001078766,0.00004580173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001491661,0.0001536905,0.0001145838,0.0005541548,0.0001244994,0.0002253991,0.000102109,0.0001094609,0.000004613062],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003937413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002789541,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00290661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01122464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984007,0.00006902296,0.0003732706,0.0003790581,0.0002819995,0.0004959037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982248,0.0003523388,0.0002599627,0.0002242499,0.0006932331,0.0002454441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003230566,0.000004512264,0.0001635696,0.0004049582,0.0001065611,0.000003012239,0.003311183,2.336166e-7,0.00005093461,0.08618559,0.899872,0.009894183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002974277,0.00002538947,0.00003247714,0.001592022,0.00002688856,0.000001933946,0.000425042,0.000001492989,0.0001106948,0.1307769,0.866475,0.0002346673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001180302,0.03983482,0.8833894,0.06223687,0.0007401723,0.0003202175,0.00002068139,0.00006096077,0.01338508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5043083,0.03021982,0.274324,0.03245682,0.01239513,0.0003128925,0.00007141795,0.0001653639,0.1457462],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6090654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2458070202554331,"score_gpt":0.3469015011526722,"score_spread":0.1010944808972391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}