{"id":"W7083313079","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102517","title":"Validation of the ORAC-PCQ, an actuarial risk assessment tool for general recidivism: A psychometric analysis based on Messick's validity framework","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; International Centre for Comparative Criminology; Université Laval; Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Psychometrics; Relevance (law); Test (biology); Reliability (semiconductor); Process (computing); Psychometric testing; Predictive validity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02110708,0.0006816715,0.0007410467,0.002596659,0.0009611286,0.001247953,0.001330064,0.001107562,0.002296541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06498068,0.0004279868,0.001694242,0.001474589,0.001324922,0.001635176,0.002001107,0.001559154,0.0007497462],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009854898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002681755,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003332355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003372762,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9894209,0.004134164,0.001305004,0.0008521603,0.003949236,0.0003385114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9586915,0.02331723,0.00358621,0.003731623,0.009739335,0.0009340554],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001022391,0.002256486,0.9013134,0.0001442381,0.0003784786,0.00006318277,0.00286025,0.002421652,0.001836193,0.002110168,0.001774866,0.08381867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003859043,0.003149136,0.9709508,0.0001708882,0.0002561136,0.0003007318,0.001450862,0.01626321,0.001649326,0.001847209,0.003514617,0.000061258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813472,0.0002397723,0.01053002,0.000315114,0.0001337725,0.001710737,0.0007712174,0.00009266996,0.004859513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886618,0.0001326857,0.00751768,0.0001800693,0.00004427403,0.001331913,0.001098161,0.00005817542,0.0009753042],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02110708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1116262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04543724184582911,"score_gpt":0.3645264264069222,"score_spread":0.3190891845610931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}