{"id":"W7090886632","doi":"10.5840/philosophica2025101329","title":"Evaluating Rudner’s Quinean Critique of Carnap","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophica International Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"History of Science and Natural History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00104146,0.0001884073,0.000324136,0.0005538208,0.0004496725,0.00002322247,0.00131178,0.00006289371,0.0005773505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003840445,0.0001436766,0.0004721359,0.00005346335,0.001567851,0.0003697014,0.00007194727,0.0003826563,0.00000802535],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008594649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004658425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007894434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002187265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979935,0.00007834838,0.0007714604,0.0002206973,0.0007526474,0.0001833095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970255,0.0003986539,0.0006429341,0.0002620386,0.001605885,0.00006501676],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003951172,0.0001667552,0.000008411369,0.00008894336,0.0002572478,0.000004116547,0.008754699,0.0001011618,0.003185565,0.9157267,0.06717711,0.004134243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006116888,0.0002237627,0.00001113169,0.0001984433,0.00009939574,0.00001099033,0.000188255,0.0003050673,0.0001057582,0.2734231,0.7246896,0.0001328164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0166343,0.05386916,0.0009283176,0.1337949,0.1411358,0.001441376,0.0003625941,0.0001367756,0.6516968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721856,0.0001665068,0.0004276901,0.001956138,0.003254643,0.00002794239,0.000008801425,0.00002173163,0.02195097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9555513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6321583,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.134053671210881,"score_gpt":0.3669980219560324,"score_spread":0.2329443507451515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}