{"id":"W7090886632","doi":"10.5840/philosophica2025101329","title":"Evaluating Rudner’s Quinean Critique of Carnap","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophica International Journal for the History of Philosophy","topic":"History of Science and Natural History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Quine; Argument (complex analysis); Ontology; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Set (abstract data type)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0153603,0.00102612,0.0009783664,0.003014641,0.006819845,0.007105516,0.002834746,0.007671663,0.004430115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02617885,0.0005299925,0.001115769,0.002028803,0.03669926,0.01225154,0.005542624,0.008976593,0.0009215974],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004177078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01342505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01337281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910516,0.00508736,0.0002170079,0.001098296,0.00207486,0.0004709285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877158,0.008582879,0.0004003164,0.0007561333,0.00221518,0.0003297696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006734566,0.00000256935,0.00002483509,0.00001115106,0.000003458194,0.00002454278,0.0005778578,0.0001455266,0.00001096845,0.9927313,0.005100487,0.00136063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008589396,0.000005966588,0.00006576665,0.00006217381,0.000004639212,0.00002745267,0.0003369228,0.0005029357,0.00008670393,0.9468061,0.05207825,0.00001454689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01466636,0.02103694,0.09773228,0.4390729,0.003528837,0.00008336001,0.000170569,0.0001858977,0.4235229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7828779,0.008128477,0.03420497,0.09692346,0.004764724,0.0004470513,0.00008087287,0.0003987575,0.07217383],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08123398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.134053671210881,"score_gpt":0.3669980219560324,"score_spread":0.2329443507451515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}