{"id":"W7095524496","doi":"","title":"� LSAT Listening Assessment: Theoretical Background and Specifications","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Corporation; Active listening; Voting; Legal education; Public law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007662266,0.0009834054,0.0005749492,0.003946764,0.001770762,0.006565696,0.002768509,0.002140424,0.02822254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02863269,0.001083767,0.00111446,0.004566489,0.004815353,0.007597991,0.003531828,0.002230558,0.00556664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00647106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007320776,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009910909,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9928067,0.002512652,0.0008008315,0.0009139017,0.002549951,0.0004158607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792711,0.01208549,0.001814533,0.001192579,0.004961374,0.0006749733],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007221678,0.0003626063,0.01530413,0.0005078259,0.00002499239,0.0002171796,0.003408758,0.003227481,0.00057907,0.8885894,0.005683206,0.08202323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001403971,0.0002473693,0.02570517,0.001240077,0.0001290001,0.000756185,0.01338952,0.0585305,0.001919199,0.826572,0.07123835,0.0001323182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.05875322,0.001149605,0.5656835,0.008281943,0.000184795,0.003954394,0.003063793,0.0008897523,0.3580391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.595174,0.001585458,0.366742,0.001150327,0.0001482099,0.01113606,0.003552628,0.0002434179,0.02026794],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02822254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09441376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1341573661874814,"score_gpt":0.4396917456960025,"score_spread":0.3055343795085211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}