{"id":"W7096372346","doi":"","title":"2007a), “An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Prestige; Promotion (chess); Quality (philosophy); Pound (networking); Quarter (Canadian coin); Reliability (semiconductor)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08220857,0.0006131115,0.001224679,0.0164344,0.002921128,0.006141237,0.001990606,0.00360948,0.009752107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2903281,0.0005658892,0.001600839,0.02299961,0.009035317,0.007005311,0.003284383,0.002366207,0.001985132],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003940186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00479367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01334728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01802916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.951795,0.02044116,0.005904029,0.003476995,0.01704086,0.001341975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3346227,0.5192669,0.0820526,0.009969442,0.05019786,0.003890596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001252565,0.0005509754,0.7787511,0.002792901,0.001712608,0.0003787961,0.01099502,0.0006461976,0.0005302295,0.02512405,0.05266981,0.1245957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003588414,0.001022991,0.8943087,0.002407251,0.002084002,0.0007274316,0.00951658,0.001669822,0.003316787,0.02425885,0.06007873,0.0002500598],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7397977,0.0391848,0.0132929,0.1078052,0.001873672,0.0008132025,0.008559728,0.00025311,0.08841974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9735581,0.006486426,0.005262119,0.007877311,0.001045699,0.0002026818,0.001671519,0.00003848273,0.003857693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9835656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4347657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6132578866264293,"score_gpt":0.6102705573489217,"score_spread":0.002987329277507667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}