{"id":"W7096606143","doi":"","title":"An Assessment of the Status of the Redfish in NAFO Divisions 3LN by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fishing; Stock assessment; Stock (firearms); Population; Abundance (ecology); Survey research; Sex ratio","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000644436,0.000214924,0.0001521396,0.001433815,0.0004196719,0.0006097933,0.000272987,0.0003637758,0.0007530624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001257902,0.0001559386,0.0002319848,0.00118755,0.0002927171,0.0005741811,0.0005087284,0.0001836402,0.0002158848],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001474694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001081777,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1700419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4158282,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996804,0.0000296433,0.000045449,0.00005563395,0.0001224776,0.00006646159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989179,0.00006742586,0.0004610639,0.00002943523,0.0004347936,0.00008933071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000307618,0.000007494798,0.9951792,0.00001388541,0.00001749031,0.00005143341,0.0004128425,0.00004010699,0.0005445336,0.00002604002,0.0001371551,0.003539052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.705457e-7,0.00002061869,0.9987285,0.000007760287,0.000004892429,0.00002645461,0.0005237348,0.00004608857,0.00003598656,0.000004923847,0.0005988416,0.000001497744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973592,0.000255219,0.00005522767,0.00004282373,0.000004258091,0.000007256664,0.0006877969,0.000002492733,0.001585688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965374,0.000308504,0.0002590625,0.00003363206,0.000005996651,0.00001916842,0.001503777,0.000001889914,0.001330649],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1700419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3381044,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01187571506391123,"score_gpt":0.319110005129485,"score_spread":0.3072342900655738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}