{"id":"W7097741628","doi":"","title":"Surveillance of Toxic Shock Syndrome in Minnesota Comments on National Surveillance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Toxic shock syndrome; Shock (circulatory); Medical surveillance; Quarter (Canadian coin); Epidemiological surveillance","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008294481,0.0002752594,0.000223075,0.001075409,0.0009113234,0.002265164,0.0008621164,0.001828593,0.001879196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01708086,0.0002626737,0.0004166537,0.0007815589,0.0007522541,0.001277789,0.001139635,0.001949115,0.0003167239],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003936269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007968672,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2076454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3512575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959538,0.001087448,0.0008238183,0.0004093471,0.001140531,0.0005850664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754768,0.005555727,0.003182705,0.0009951156,0.01192607,0.002863534],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002393374,0.00007961259,0.3851579,0.0007117509,0.00008123532,0.000610797,0.002144228,0.0009017251,0.002725701,0.006364226,0.4634781,0.1375054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004057361,0.0002650159,0.5747064,0.002039006,0.00008234187,0.000680719,0.002561148,0.001203441,0.0007509001,0.0008621942,0.4167138,0.00009442729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.1489311,0.02800903,0.003128072,0.7203476,0.0158641,0.0002082308,0.0045159,0.0004724314,0.07852356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7216805,0.02049037,0.008424628,0.2093182,0.01264826,0.0001961442,0.004434334,0.0001022929,0.02270526],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2076454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4128736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06854035990357371,"score_gpt":0.420999544470034,"score_spread":0.3524591845664603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}