{"id":"W7097986666","doi":"","title":"Motazedian D. Probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis for four Canadian cities. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2011;101:190–201","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Seismic hazard; Hazard; Moment magnitude scale; Probabilistic logic; Probabilistic analysis of algorithms; Magnitude (astronomy); Hazard analysis; Earthquake scenario","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001066212,0.0007923304,0.0003750133,0.002702683,0.001812931,0.001198878,0.001338957,0.0003497719,0.002156532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003042837,0.0003495322,0.0009302572,0.003001937,0.0006453718,0.0004340277,0.0009192856,0.0005456351,0.0001535357],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01949212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02078087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922882,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996265,0.00004027128,0.00001418923,0.00003591711,0.0001905019,0.00009257454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987839,0.0001993454,0.0001162408,0.00007627669,0.0007398087,0.00008442803],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002511584,0.0001067199,0.2396291,0.0001326643,0.0001720551,0.0004411939,0.0006627513,0.6408863,0.002747833,0.007192091,0.006670091,0.101108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004017662,0.00006670446,0.2450738,0.00003690057,0.0001376224,0.00007640837,0.001687664,0.7430699,0.002306407,0.002545366,0.00484168,0.0001172841],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.943271,0.0004766068,0.03993265,0.0005912148,0.00001692828,0.0002935441,0.005461427,0.0003225492,0.009634125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753578,0.0003098412,0.01846947,0.00002029251,0.000002602157,0.00005678976,0.002645921,0.00004355493,0.003093762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01949212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1414259,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01295795943869893,"score_gpt":0.1867774953527886,"score_spread":0.1738195359140896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}