{"id":"W7100830052","doi":"","title":"Development of the WAIS-III estimate of premorbid ability for Canadians (EPAC)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Cognitive Abilities and Testing","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample (material); Variance (accounting); Regression analysis; Regression; Raw score; Linear regression; Item response theory; Explained variation","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00630339,0.0009925299,0.0007299084,0.004763878,0.001625135,0.001374778,0.002391888,0.0004199835,0.004247708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0230445,0.0004973855,0.001040591,0.00278774,0.0004044256,0.0006286423,0.001171179,0.00150413,0.001638624],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01062102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0313765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9141795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9150558,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968792,0.0002944885,0.0001885911,0.0003287488,0.002067862,0.0002411211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903064,0.0006364532,0.00037525,0.0003262765,0.008074207,0.0002814152],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002118475,0.0001730139,0.5168902,0.0003642817,0.0004046657,0.00008874666,0.0005895011,0.008662879,0.0008022851,0.01033068,0.08149868,0.3799833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008061042,0.0001491119,0.8932936,0.0003096571,0.000186248,0.0002170777,0.000490906,0.02967954,0.002031557,0.002771637,0.07065956,0.000130363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3770639,0.005220871,0.303605,0.003079455,0.0008778027,0.01402093,0.1760232,0.007343909,0.112765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4626814,0.002472105,0.4261518,0.0005210974,0.00009115121,0.006286834,0.08589703,0.0008140308,0.0150844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0858205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1726518,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04606796755512203,"score_gpt":0.330811272107791,"score_spread":0.2847433045526689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}