{"id":"W7101136451","doi":"","title":"GLOBAL STABILIZATION AND SYNCHRONIZATION OF N-SCROLL CHAOTIC ATTRACTORS IN A MODIFIED CHUA’S CIRCUIT WITH HYPERBOLIC TANGENT FUNCTION Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 2009.19:2563-2572. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO WES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Chaos control and synchronization","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attractor; Control theory (sociology); Hyperbolic function; Synchronization (alternating current); Synchronization of chaos; Chaotic; Simple (philosophy); Tangent; Equilibrium point; CHAOS (operating system)","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001069585,0.0002081533,0.0003419851,0.000137172,0.0001290637,0.00002574688,0.0001117782,0.00008720827,0.0003487261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005089119,0.000203532,0.00004871249,0.0005368431,0.0001394641,0.0004099847,0.00003587058,0.00008713089,0.000005311496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002987925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002717561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05996024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04528894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986468,0.00007546128,0.0003681309,0.0004149076,0.0002936977,0.0002010199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999103,0.00003172353,0.0003290597,0.0002380829,0.0002068731,0.00009130973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002057691,0.000429069,0.9850143,0.0000293609,0.00008343678,8.108737e-7,0.002297683,0.005047248,0.002986543,0.0007434216,0.0001661655,0.002996244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004757459,0.0002260942,0.9684322,0.00009181729,0.0001547926,0.000001865433,0.001044158,0.02318329,0.0007451032,0.0005042764,0.0004685991,0.000390315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8447139,0.0001412629,0.1539144,0.00006058006,0.00007838849,0.0004520518,0.0001676903,0.00002417155,0.0004476074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983605,0.00002676047,0.00004764239,0.00001153907,0.00003467607,0.000004407156,0.0009545194,0.00001179177,0.0005482078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1538667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0125652768077183,"score_gpt":0.1777021932668177,"score_spread":0.1651369164590994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}