{"id":"W7101419411","doi":"10.1017/rsm.2025.10032","title":"Exploring the methodological quality and risk of bias in 200 systematic reviews: A comparative study of ROBIS and AMSTAR-2 tools","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; McGill University; Public Health Agency of Canada; Nova Scotia Health Authority; St. Michael's Hospital; University of Ottawa; Queen's University; McMaster University; University of Toronto; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Quality (philosophy); Systematic review; Sample (material); Systematic error; Critical appraisal; Meta-analysis; Publication bias","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4593254,0.001736304,0.009079557,0.03980591,0.00183952,0.006870172,0.003544241,0.002797981,0.002164636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7994819,0.002842403,0.01694768,0.04189891,0.003756975,0.009528968,0.01002485,0.002090751,0.0004844314],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008727537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01579535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002923159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007430208,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2855057,0.3125582,0.3059576,0.01389656,0.07971388,0.002368148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1146462,0.7184833,0.1073228,0.0177911,0.04038778,0.001368867],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007771511,0.0004574561,0.2469475,0.3188259,0.08770306,0.001449675,0.05658484,0.001985689,0.002194912,0.003628855,0.006364779,0.2660858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008625548,0.008768122,0.5542216,0.2085624,0.1163969,0.006801102,0.03609303,0.009874128,0.004298515,0.0116976,0.03296091,0.001700125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.657949,0.2274212,0.05010774,0.005201723,0.0008730487,0.03672737,0.01405582,0.0008146351,0.00684945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229499,0.02524323,0.09009887,0.001622275,0.000317543,0.05386122,0.005306527,0.0002220624,0.00037827],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5406746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6667481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9957225701194713,"score_gpt":0.7796026000981889,"score_spread":0.2161199700212824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}