{"id":"W7106006583","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2025-0107","title":"Refining the distribution and confirming the phylogenetic relationship of the endangered landlocked harbour seal <i>Phoca vitulina mellonae</i> using environmental DNA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kativik Regional Government; Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Phoca; Environmental DNA; Endangered species; Subspecies; Habitat; Mitochondrial DNA; Critically endangered; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006047474,0.0002026812,0.0001372019,0.001398208,0.0004683691,0.0004973381,0.0002523527,0.0002813385,0.0008222841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001009049,0.0001096457,0.0001636049,0.0004843558,0.0004164258,0.0003098049,0.0006276022,0.0002511695,0.0002210812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004939132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003979118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02106619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05343568,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997171,0.00005067748,0.00001590272,0.0001171953,0.0000320966,0.00006709349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999363,0.0001040561,0.0002377529,0.00005993521,0.0001408797,0.0000942372],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009994982,0.00004100352,0.8440349,0.00005588601,0.00004584493,0.0002391604,0.00192242,0.0002276752,0.1376182,0.000264164,0.0001128756,0.0153379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002377253,0.00005962362,0.9931356,0.00002260639,0.0000209995,0.0001640788,0.0009865582,0.0003780953,0.003476379,0.00004959725,0.001699122,0.000004974166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985365,0.0001239311,0.0006093213,0.00002898295,0.000002797762,0.000006746863,0.0001566146,0.000003854724,0.0005311262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984307,0.00006172217,0.0009110749,0.00003690633,0.000003837514,0.000005634253,0.0003156915,0.000002364136,0.0002321201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02106619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04188716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02070655179522913,"score_gpt":0.2047611207945924,"score_spread":0.1840545689993633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}